Saturday, October 26, 2013

Social Economic Status in correlation with educational outcomes (Mike Howlett)

Social economic status can broadly be defined as the state of an individual’s income, education and occupational status. It is fundamentally an intersection of gender, indigenous status, geographic location and familial circumstances which, evidence has shown, brings a range of both advantages and disadvantages to students which is ultimately derivative of their social class. Social economic status (SES) can be broken down into three main categories that being; working class, middle class and upper class. Working class is considered the lowest of social classes whilst middle class represents a comfortable living environment for those who have experienced a better education and subsequently, a higher income. The upper class denotes the wealthiest members of society with the highest income, greatest political power and unrivalled access to educational resources.
            From this simple breaking down of the classes, one could already recognise that students from these divergent lifestyles could experience education differently and consequently represent different educational outcomes. Anna Patty from the Sydney Morning Herald attests to this, stating that “student performance in tests is based on their social economic status” (2010) and that “students on the whole performed only as well as their family background allowed” (2010). This is because of a range of variables which influence all aspects of an individual’s life. For instance; a lower SES ascertains a lower income which ultimately has an effect on a student’s health status and level of cognitive stimulation. Students in these given circumstances live in homes in which education is, for the most part, seen as a necessity in regards to a social norm rather than a fundamental part of growth in cognitive and social functioning. Moreover, there is usually next to no home based cognitive stimulation and more often than not, a destructive home and familial environment in which “parents are more likely to give orders to their children in their interactions” (Lareau, 2003). Students who experience this lifestyle often envisage education as having no real purpose and see themselves as burdened with their circumstances, becoming trapped in an overriding sense of ‘reproductive habitus’ in which they see a set future in the working class and no alternative, ultimately leading to the question of; what’s the point?
            Contrastingly, students of middle to upper class SES experience a home environment which fosters cognitive development. In these circumstances, “parents are more likely to interact and play with their children….parents take an active role in their children’s education and development by using controlled activities and fostering a sense of entitlement” (Lareau, 2003). Students in these conditions are at an undeniable advantage in regards to social and cognitive development. Their families higher income allows for a more sustainable and pleasurable way of life, usually with a vast array of educational resources including; tutors, text books and higher regarded educational institutions with more facilities and opportunities for the student to thrive in their chosen field of practice (private education).
            To try an accommodate for the inequalities experienced by those in lower SES, a number of policies and initiatives have been introduced such as; Burseries, special needs classes and development and counselling within schools.

In trying to address and understand this clear inequity in regards to educational experiences, the NSW Secondary Principles Council:

“Calls for the use of student data instead of census data to measure social economic
status. It wants a suspension of comparisons until they can be independently validated and the public can be assured the similarity is accurate, meaningful and comprehensible, rather than simply statistical” (2010).



References:
1.      Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal Childhoods: Race, Class, and Family Life. University of
California Press

2.      Patty, A. (2010, March 26). ‘Economic status key to success at school’.
Sydney Morning Herald. Available at:

No comments:

Post a Comment